Current:Home > reviewsWest Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies -Wealth Momentum Network
West Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies
View
Date:2025-04-20 05:33:29
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — West Virginia lawmakers on Thursday soundly rejected a bill that would have expanded a law enforcement database to include collecting DNA samples from people arrested for certain felonies.
Some legislators cited privacy concerns during a lengthy debate before the 66-30 vote by the Republican-dominated House of Delegates. Three members were absent.
“This is just another step away from our liberties,” said Republican Del. Rolland Jennings of Preston County.
Current state law requires a DNA sample to be taken from anyone convicted of a felony and certain misdemeanors. The bill would have expanded the law to obtain DNA through cheek swabs from adults arrested on felony charges of violence against someone, a burglary or a case involving a minor. The samples would be sent to a state crime lab and the results stored in an FBI database.
“If you don’t want your DNA taken, don’t do a heinous crime,” said Republican Del. Scot Heckert, a bill supporter.
But some Democrats were concerned about the bill’s potential infringement on Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
“This bill is extremely broad,” Ohio County Democrat Shawn Fluharty said. “It’s dangerous territory to put people in a DNA database simply because they’ve been arrested just for probable cause and accused of a crime.”
Mason County Republican Jonathan Pinson, a bill supporter, said it was no more of a constitutional concern than collecting fingerprints from suspects. Pinson said lawmakers should be more concerned about helping crime victims whose cases remain unsolved “because we don’t know where to look” for evidence.
The bill also contained steps to expunge someone’s DNA records from the database if they were cleared of the felony charges.
Prior to the vote, the House twice rejected bids to halt debate on the bill.
veryGood! (5432)
Related
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Ranking
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Recommendation
'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease